The inclusion of a racial slur during the broadcast of the BAFTAs was a breach of the BBC’s editorial standards, a review has found.
The broadcaster’s executive complaints unit (ECU) said the inclusion of the slur shouted by a Tourette’s campaigner was “highly offensive” and “had no editorial justification”. However, investigators said the breach made during the initial broadcast was unintentional.
John Davidson, who suffers from the neurological condition and was at the BAFTAs ceremony in February to celebrate a film about his life, yelled out the offensive word as the first award of the night was presented by Sinners stars Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo.
In an email to BBC staff, seen by Sky News, sent following the release of the report, chief content officer Kate Phillips said she had written to Lindo, Jordan and Davidson since the incident to apologise.
The BBC is now strengthening pre-event planning and reviewing production set-up for live events, she said, to include better assessment of potential on-air risks and improve real-time monitoring of what goes to air.
John Davidson, left, was at the BAFTAs to celebrate I Swear, a film about his life starring Robert Aramayo (right). Pic: AP
In its report, the ECU said members of the production team monitoring the ceremony in an outside broadcast vehicle said they did not hear or recognise the word. Investigators accepted their account, agreeing the word “was extremely indistinct, to the point where it might well not have been recognised”.
About 10 minutes later, the ECU said, there was another occurrence of the word which was recognised and “immediately edited out in accordance with the protocols on offensive language” which were in place.
“There is no reason to conclude they would have applied the protocols in one case while deliberately ignoring them in the other,” the ECU report said.
In response to further complaints that the slur should have been edited out of the programme available after the event on iPlayer, the investigators said there was “a lack of clarity among the team as to whether the word was audible”, which resulted in a delay of several hours.
This was “a serious mistake, because there could be no certainty that the word would be inaudible to all viewers”, they said, adding that the the unedited recording remaining available “for so long aggravated the offence caused by the inadvertent inclusion” of the word during the initial broadcast.
The BAFTAs programme was edited down from the three-hour live show filmed two hours earlier that evening, and went out on BBC1 at 7pm.
Viewers were able to see the offending moment on BBC iPlayer for more than 12 hours before the programme was pulled to be edited. After this, they saw the message: “This episode will be available soon.”
The ECU also responded to complaints about a decision to edit out remarks in the acceptance speech of Akinola Davies Jr, which included the words “Free Palestine”. Many complaints characterised this as an “instance of censorship,” the ECU said, and a “misapplication of the BBC’s editorial standards of impartiality”.
However, the investigation found the production team’s decision “did not hinge on considerations of impartiality”, but rather the main consideration was cutting out an hour of the three-hour show to fit the two-hour broadcast.
“As is usual in coverage of events of this kind, cuts were made in some of the longer acceptance speeches, including that of Mr Davies,” the report said. The ECU found the editing of the speech did not raise an issue of editorial standards.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.
